Hi Raju,
In the original case BC Srinivasa Setty (1981), a supreme court judgement, it was held that the Cost of acquisition of a self generated asset is indeterminate. therefore, capital gains cannot be computed when a self generated asset is transferred.
To nullify this judgement, the ammendment was bought and intorduction section 55(2) took place, where few assets were notified where cost of acquisition is considered to be "Nil"and hence the whole amount shall be taxable as capital gains. Those assets are:
- Goodwill of business
- Tenancy rights
- Stage carriage permits
- Loom hours
- The right to manufacture, produce or process
- a trademark or brandname associated with business
- a right to carry on business
Except these, no other self generated assets covered. The inference drawn post this amendment was that this section does not cover Goodwill of (Profession) in any way. Hence, no capital gains could be attracted on sale of self generated goodwill of profession.
However, the person further acquiring this goodwill of a profession would be liable on capital gain taxation if he sells the same in future as at that time it will no more remain the self generated goodwill.
Thanks
Damini