• LLP Interest on Retained Profits/Remuneration: Are Books Enough or Must the Deed Reflect Updated Capital?

1. If an LLP deed allows interest at 12% on partner capital, and a partner retains profits, remuneration and interest in the LLP which are subsequently treated as capital for earning interest, is it sufficient for these balances to be reflected in the books of account and audited financial statements, or should the LLP deed also be updated to reflect those amounts? Which approach is more defensible during scrutiny?

2. For working partner remuneration, what is the most defensible approach in light of CBDT Circular 739: (a) fixed remuneration amounts, (b) a formula from which the remuneration can be calculated to the exact amount, or (c) a clause allowing remuneration up to the maximum amount permitted under the Income-tax Act? Why?
Asked 7 hours ago in Corporate Tax

Dear Querist,

Books alone are not the safest approach. The LLP deed should clearly authorise interest on partner capital/current account balances, including retained profits, remuneration and interest credited and treated as capital. In scrutiny, an amended/supplementary deed plus proper ledger and audited accounts is more defensible.

For working partner remuneration, the safest clause is a clear formula by which the exact amount can be calculated. Fixed amount is also acceptable, but less flexible. A vague clause saying “up to the maximum allowed under the Income-tax Act” is weaker in view of CBDT Circular 739.

Practical step: execute a supplementary LLP deed with clear capital and remuneration clauses before claiming deduction.

For a more detailed review of your case, you may book a phone consultation.

CA Shubham Goyal

Shubham Goyal
CA, Delhi
593 Answers
23 Consultations

Ask a Chartered Accountant

Get tax answers from top-rated CAs in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous!
  Ask a CA