LLP interest on retained profits/remuneration: are books enough or must the deed reflect updated capital?

LLP interest on retained profits/remuneration: are books enough or must the deed reflect updated capital?

1. If an LLP deed allows interest at 12% on partner capital, and a partner retains profits, remuneration and interest in the LLP which are subsequently treated as capital for earning interest, is it sufficient for these balances to be reflected in the books of account and audited financial statements, or should the LLP deed also be updated to reflect those amounts? Which approach is more defensible during scrutiny?

2. For working partner remuneration, what is the most defensible approach in light of CBDT Circular 739: (a) fixed remuneration amounts, (b) a formula from which the remuneration can be calculated to the exact amount, or (c) a clause allowing remuneration up to the maximum amount permitted under the Income-tax Act? Why?

Asked 2 months ago in Corporate Tax

Dear Querist,

Books alone are not the safest approach. The LLP deed should clearly authorise interest on partner capital/current account balances, including retained profits, remuneration and interest credited and treated as capital. In scrutiny, an amended/supplementary deed plus proper ledger and audited accounts is more defensible.

For working partner remuneration, the safest clause is a clear formula by which the exact amount can be calculated. Fixed amount is also acceptable, but less flexible. A vague clause saying “up to the maximum allowed under the Income-tax Act” is weaker in view of CBDT Circular 739.

Practical step: execute a supplementary LLP deed with clear capital and remuneration clauses before claiming deduction.

For a more detailed review of your case, you may book a phone consultation.

CA Shubham Goyal

Shubham Goyal

CA, Delhi

Available Now

628 Answers

28 Consultations

Talk to Shubham Goyal NOW!

Appreciate the response, Shubham. I am clear on the remuneration part.

On the interest part, I still have a small doubt. My question is specifically about the capital amount itself.

If the deed already authorizes interest on partner capital at a specified rate, does the actual capital contribution amount also need to be reflected in the deed (and updated through supplementary deeds as it changes at the end of the year) for the interest deduction to be fully defensible from a tax perspective, or is it sufficient for the capital balance to be reflected in the books of account and audited financial statements?

My concern is that the capital contribution amount stated in the deed may become significantly lower than the capital balance reflected in the books over time (due to retained profits, additional contributions, etc.). If interest is claimed on the higher capital balance reflected in the books, could the difference between the deed capital and book capital create a technical mismatch or give the tax authorities a reason to question the interest deduction?

Asked 2 months ago

Dear Querist,

From a tax deduction perspective, the deed need not be updated every year only to mention the exact capital balance.

However, the deed should not restrict interest only to the original fixed capital amount. It should clearly say that interest is payable on partner capital/current account balances as reflected in the LLP books, including retained profits, remuneration, interest and further contributions credited and not withdrawn.

If the deed mentions a lower fixed capital and the books show a much higher balance, the department may question the excess interest. The most defensible approach is to execute one supplementary LLP deed clarifying this treatment, rather than updating the amount every year.