My father's return was marked defective in January 2017, and the defect was as follows:
"Tax payer having income from business and profession but has not filled Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account as required in explanation (d) under section 139(9) read with section 44AA."
THIS DEFECT of Explanation (d) WAS FIXED AND E-FILING U/S 139(9) WAS DONE in January 2017 itself.
_________________________________________________
Now the above-mentioned 139(9) return has been processed and again marked as defective.
The DEFECT:
"Tax payer having income from business and profession but has not filled Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account as required in explanation (f) under section 139(9) read with section 44AA."
This time it's an explanation (f) defect.
What to do? Please advise.
Asked 7 years ago in Income Tax
Liable to maintain books of account was marked 'NO' while fixing section (d) defect. The FIRST DEFECT.
_____________________________________
But perhaps the return filer did not fill other things correctly while fixing the return? Hence the second defect?
I say this because the second defect is DIFFERENT from the first one.
The probable resolution offered by e filing site specifically in the email (Second Defect):
"The Part B of Profit and Loss Account and Part B of the Balance Sheet (i.e. No Accounts Section) should be entered in the corrected return"
Asked 7 years ago
What is section (f) defect?
______________________________
Vishakha - liable to maintain book of account is not there and was marked No.
Abhishek, thanks.
My father's tax filer did not fill 'No Accounts Case' after saying no to 'liable to maintain book of accounts".
I just checked my father's defective return XML file and ---
'No Accounts Case' in his BS is EMPTY.
"No Accounts Case" in his PL mentions only GROSS PROFIT and NET PROFIT.
What is the solution? Just to fill these columns? This is what resolution offered by e-filing seems to be saying. As follows:
""The Part B of Profit and Loss Account and Part B of the Balance Sheet (i.e. No Accounts Section) should be entered in the corrected return"
Is this correct?
Asked 7 years ago
Thank you all for the answers.
Vishakha - I don't know the error code. How do you see error code?
Thanks Shyam, and to refer your answer:
In 'No Accounts Case' can the expenses be put as Zero? Father has no accounts maintained.
On the 'No Accounts Case' BS page, I found the data fields EMPTY. You have written put 'zero' compulsary.
Will other experts here agree? That on the BS page, put zero compulsorily, if no details available?
All that I have written above deals with 'No Accounts Case' only.
Asked 7 years ago
One of you wrote:
"Instead of putting zeroes, I suggest that you should make reasonable estimate of your creditors, debtors and cash/bank balances and put them in Part B of the Balance Sheet."
I don't know all this. Father is a retired engineering professional. Did some informal work. Got some money for it. There's no accounts.
Mother gave a loan to father, ( personal loan), many years back, should it be entered here? This is ITR4.
Mother's loan to father is a personal loan, it is not connected to business activity.
She gave a loan of 226,000 rupees in maybe 2010 or 2009 I am not sure.
Loan that mother gave to father there's no paperwork or formal document on it.
Please advice. I am confused.
What is the harm in putting zeros in Part B, Bal Sheet , 'No Accounts Case', in the absence of Information??
Asked 7 years ago
Thank you all very much for the answers.
Is it possible to file ITR4S for AY 2016-17 at this point instead of re-fixing the defective ITR4 for AY 2016-17.
His business income was 174,000 approx. for this AY 2016-17.
If you feel it is possible and recommended at this point - then - please give suggestions on how to make ITR4S successful now.
His other income includes:
1) Saving A/C interest.
2) FD interest
3) Post Office NSC maturity.
No capital gain.
Asked 7 years ago