Mutual fund taxation discrepancy
sir
please go through the following to help me(an old man of 70 years)
.assuming a gain of rs 80000 after one year against an investment of rs ten lakhs ie rs 1000000 in a non equity mf what will be the tax implications in the gain of rs 80000 in mf.
consideration of only one year is given ,as my son will take possession of a flat after one year when the money will be required.
one reputed tax consultant in a column has opined as follows
let's say you invest rs 10 lakh in a mutual fund. a year later, the value of the investment has increased to rs 10.8 lakh. now, you want to withdraw the rs 80,000 you have gained. note that out of the investment you hold, 7.4% is the gain (rs 80000 is 7.4% of a total value rs 1080000)and the remaining 92.6% is the principal that you had invested. here's the key idea: when you withdraw any money, the withdrawal shall be deemed to consist of the gains and the principal in this same proportion, for tax purposes. therefore, of that rs 80,000, only rs 5,926(7.4% of rs 80000) will be considered gains and will therefore be added to your taxable income. this makes an enormous difference. in an equivalent fd, you would pay rs 24,720 as tax in the highest slab. in the mutual fund, you would pay rs 1,831 as tax.
but as per amfi india website vide www.amfiindia.com/investor-corner/knowledge-center/tax-corner.html
subject-incidence of tax on mutual fund investors (i) capital gain tax
1) equity-oriented funds have no tax on long-term capital gains; i.e., if you sell your fund after 12 months from the date you bought it, you don’t pay capital gains tax. on short-term holding, the capital gains tax is a flat 15 per cent, no matter which tax bracket you belong to.and mf schemes that invest at least 65% of its fund corpus into equity and equity related instruments are known as equity mutual funds.
2)for debt funds, short-term is a holding period of less than 36 months. long-term holding is a period more than 36 months. on short-term capital gains, you are taxed at your slab rate. that is, if you’re in the 20% tax bracket, you pay 20% of your capital gains as tax. if you’re in the 10% tax bracket, you pay 10% tax on your capital gain.
on long-term capital gains, your tax is 20% of the gain with cost indexation benefits. indexation is the method by which your cost is adjusted for inflation. what this does is to effectively reduce your absolute gain, as your cost goes up and thus reduces your taxable profit.
my point of discussion is for non equity funds at short term
as per the tax consultant mentioned above the consideration value should be 7.4%of gain ie rs 80000=rs 5926 and at 30.9% tax slab it is rs 1831 only.
but does the amfi india site clarify this point of consideration that for tax purposes when you withdraw money only 7.4% of 80000 should be considered as capital gain and not rs 80000 .as a whole
important point
actually is there any difference between total withdrawal of rs 1080000 and only interest earned part of rs 80000
a)in case of lump sum withdrawal of rs 1080000 the tax will be much higher (rs 24720 considering highest tax bracket of 30% for a capital gain of rs 80000)
b)but if we withdraw only interest value of rs 80000,capital gain will be only 7.4%of rs 80000 ie only rs 5926
please post your answer with due consideration of points (a) and (b) above
with thanks.
Asked 6 years ago in Income Tax
Mr Dagar has replied.Tax will always be levied on the withdrawal amount(.NOT UNDERSTOOD BY ME)
If you withdraw only 80000, tax will be levied on 80000 less proportionate cost.
I want to know the Tax Amount in both cases
a)If I withdraw only Rs 80000
and b)If I withdraw the full amount of Rs 1080000
Please help with your answers
Asked 6 years ago
Actually the question has arisen due to the fact that an article has been published in Times of India,Hyderabad edition dated 09/10/2017 in Personal Finance page written by Mr Dhirendra Kumar,CEO,Value Research(www.valueresearchonline.com).Excerpts from the article is quoted below.I am a layman in this line,a Retired Chief Engineer.Please see the details.I am only seeking clarification from Experts.If the tax to be paid is only Rs 1831(when capital gain is Rs 5936) in stead of Rs 24720(when Capital Gain is Rs 80000) it will be a eye reckoner to Tax Payers like me
IMPORTANT
I am referring to an article published by Mr Kumar in TOI ,Hyderabad edition dated 09/10/2017
Title- Mutual funds have multiple tax advantages over bank fixed deposits
Excerpts from His Article
Let's say you invest Rs 10 lakh in a mutual fund. A year later, the value of the investment has increased to Rs 10.8 lakh. Now, you want to withdraw the Rs 80,000 you have gained. Note that out of the investment you hold, 7.4% is the gain and the remaining 92.6% is the principal that you had invested. Here's the key idea: when you withdraw any money, the withdrawal shall be deemed to consist of the gains and the principal in this same proportion, for tax purposes. Therefore, of that Rs 80,000, only Rs 5,926 will be considered gains and will therefore be added to your taxable income. This makes an enormous difference. In an equivalent FD, you would pay Rs 24,720 as tax in the highest slab. In the mutual fund, you would pay Rs 1,831 as tax.
AS PER Mr Kumar the consideration VALUE SHOULD BE 7.4%OF GAIN ie Rs 80000=Rs 5926 AND AT 30.9% TAX SLAB IT IS Rs 1831 ONLY.7.4% figure comes ,as Rs 80000 is 7.4% of a total of Rs 1080000.
I am trying to CLARIFY THE POINT as above from Experts,so that as a Income Tax Payers I can take it up with IT Authorities. With thanks.
Asked 6 years ago
Actually the question has arisen due to the fact that an article has been published in Times of India,Hyderabad edition dated 09/10/2017 in Personal Finance page written by Mr Dhirendra Kumar,CEO,Value Research(www.valueresearchonline.com).Excerpts from the article is quoted below.I am a layman in this line,a Retired Chief Engineer.Please see the details.I am only seeking clarification from Experts.If the tax to be paid is only Rs 1831(when capital gain is Rs 5936) in stead of Rs 24720(when Capital Gain is Rs 80000) it will be a eye reckoner to Tax Payers like me
IMPORTANT
I am referring to an article published by Mr Kumar in TOI ,Hyderabad edition dated 09/10/2017
Title- Mutual funds have multiple tax advantages over bank fixed deposits
Excerpts from His Article
Let's say you invest Rs 10 lakh in a mutual fund. A year later, the value of the investment has increased to Rs 10.8 lakh. Now, you want to withdraw the Rs 80,000 you have gained. Note that out of the investment you hold, 7.4% is the gain and the remaining 92.6% is the principal that you had invested. Here's the key idea: when you withdraw any money, the withdrawal shall be deemed to consist of the gains and the principal in this same proportion, for tax purposes. Therefore, of that Rs 80,000, only Rs 5,926 will be considered gains and will therefore be added to your taxable income. This makes an enormous difference. In an equivalent FD, you would pay Rs 24,720 as tax in the highest slab. In the mutual fund, you would pay Rs 1,831 as tax.
AS PER Mr Kumar the consideration VALUE SHOULD BE 7.4%OF GAIN ie Rs 80000=Rs 5926 AND AT 30.9% TAX SLAB IT IS Rs 1831 ONLY.7.4% figure comes ,as Rs 80000 is 7.4% of a total of Rs 1080000.
I am trying to CLARIFY THE POINT as above from Experts,so that as a Income Tax Payers I can take it up with IT Authorities. With thanks.
Asked 6 years ago
Atten -Mr Dugar
If I have correctly learnt from you,if I withdraw Rs 80000(partial),Capital Gain will be less and tax will be less(Proportionate).But if I withdraw Rs 1080000 in totality tax will be full (as per the article it is 24720).
Please give one line reply o.k.,if I am correct this time
With thanks
Asked 6 years ago